Welcome to Tweet this book!

Book_beach

The author's feet, recently 

“If you read just one book about social media, it probably shouldn’t be this one.


But if you’ve got a couple of hours to spare and want to see what a goat-farming ex military-pilot advertising creative director makes of it all, then you’ve come to the right place.”

To download your free copy, just click the “pay with a Tweet or Facebook” button at the top of this post. A window will open asking you to log in via Twitter or Facebook so the Pay with a Tweet application can work its magic. (It's a 15MB download and there's no progress bar - so please hang in there!) You’ll then see a Tweet or Facebook update I’ve written so you can tell the world what you’ve done. Feel free to edit the tweet, but the link it contains is fixed and points back to this page. Oooh, viral monkey!

Once you’ve sent your tweet you’ll go straight to the download page where you can view the 90-page PDF and “save-as” to download it to your hard drive.

If you’d like to comment on anything in the book, I’d love to hear from you so I can continue to update it. Just use the “comments” section at the end of the other posts in this blog. There’s one for each chapter. (Note: the blog doesn’t include all the content from the book, especially illustrations – I really recommend you download the book for the best reading experience.)

Thanks!

Vaughn

 

P.S. If you want to learn more about the free distribution and promotion model I've used for this book, there's a picture here: http://vaughndavis.posterous.com/how-to-publish-a-book-for-nothing

Chapter 1: Why do social? Because social is doing you!

Are your ears burning?

They should be.

Because all over the social Internet, people are talking about you and your brand.

Some of them are saying nice things. And some are saying nasty things. Who’s to say if they’re even telling the truth?

For many of us, truth matters a lot less than trust.

If someone we trust tells us something about a company or a person, that’s good enough for us. It doesn’t have to be true; it just has to be, in the words of my nine year old son, true enough to believe.

It’s how human communication has always worked. If you’re a marketer, you’ll know that the power of word of mouth trumps any media channel you can buy by the second, click or column inch.

Which isn’t just an opportunity, it’s a problem.

People are talking about you and your brand. And they’re not necessarily telling the truth.

If your brand matters to you, then you need to be part of those conversations.

Why do social?

Because social’s doing you.

Of course, not every voice is worth listening to, and not every conversation is worth joining. Luckily, it’s easy to get a gauge of that on Facebook and Twitter. Even if whoever is slagging you off is hiding behind anonymity, it’s easy to see how many Friends or Followers they have, and who those people are. So if Angry of Suburbia has only three followers, maybe letting him go ahead and be angry is the right thing to do. But if those three followers are the Prime Minister and a pair of tabloid journalists, it might be worth getting involved now and then.

Naturally, there can be an upside to these conversations too. Listen closely and you’ll hear great ideas about how what you do can be done better, suggestions for new products or services, or improvements to old ones. When you act on those suggestions you’ll be rewarding your customers and making them feel, even more, like they own the brand.

Which they do.

Marketers, CEOs and advertising agencies come and go. What endures is customers. It’s your customers; their relationship with your brand, the perceptions they’ve built up over years, decades and even generations, who truly define who you are.

And for a marketer, that’s one of the greatest opportunities social presents. Use it well and you’ve got a direct connection to the people who own your brand! That’s not just market intelligence, that’s market emotion. And that’s pretty cool.

The power of $%^&*!

“I was extremely disappointed by having to wait 10 minutes for my meal at Goatburger”

“I’ve flown with Goat Air for years and I’ve never experienced such terrible service”

“This is the last time I ever buy a GoatPhone.”

Peel back the skin (OK the scab) on most customer complaints and what you’ll often find is not … OK, maybe that metaphor should stop there. What you’ll often find is an incredibly loyal customer.

If someone is new to your business, tries it and walks off, they may or may not complain and tell their friends.

If someone has been with you for years and suddenly has a terrible experience, you’ll hear about it!

By listening to the bad things people are saying about you, and looking behind the anger, you’ll often find a temporarily disappointed brand advocate … it only takes one bad experience to go from advocate to badvocate! Managed well, these grumpy fans can become just as energetic about spreading the good word about your business as they were about the bad.

Let me tell you a story.

It was the month before Christmas, and Telecom New Zealand had set up an enormous illuminated Christmas tree in a park near our home. The 1st of December was to see it lit for the first time, so my sons and I walked up the road to join in the fun.

I’m a Telecom customer (almost everyone in New Zealand has been, one way or another) and have done advertising work for them in the past. I quite like Telecom, and was feeling pretty positive as we walked to the park – despite the light drizzle that was beginning to fall.

The lights were supposed to come on at 9pm – Christmas is in the Southern Hemisphere summer, so it gets dark pretty late. 9 o’clock came and went, and nothing had happened. Actually, the drizzle had turned to heavy drizzle, so we ducked under a tree for shelter. It was getting past the boys’ bedtime and even the prospect of an illuminated Christmas tree wasn’t exciting them anymore.

Then a Telecom security guard walked over to talk to us.

Cool!, I thought … some news on when the lights are coming on.

But that wasn’t what he wanted. Could we please move from under the tree, he asked, as the VIPs would be walking through that way soon.

Move out from under the tree.

Into the rain.

So the important people – whose late arrival was apparently holding things up anyway – could walk from their VIP cars to their VIP seats without their VIP hair getting too wet.

Naturally, I Tweeted.

Naturally, I didn’t say very nice things.

Telecom could have ignored my grumpy, slightly wet tweets, but they didn’t. They jumped right in and fairly cheekily asked why I was at a Telecom party if I disliked Telecom so much.

I replied with equal cheek that if only Telecom’s friends were at the party then it would be a very small party!

Then Santa arrived, the lights came on, and we all went home wet but mostly happy. I didn’t think much more about the incident until I got to the office on Monday and found something from Telecom, addressed to me:

An umbrella.

I use it all the time, and every time someone asks me where I got it I tell them this story.

You could easily dismiss Telecom’s initial response as a little bit rash and even a bit rude. But for me, it was an example of social being used in a completely appropriate way. Through our online relationship they knew me well enough to know I could give as good as I got, and that I would respond better to a cheeky tweet than a measured, PR-approved comment or apology.

They were right.

They saw a conversation about their brand, they joined in, they responded honestly and with emotion and turned my badvocacy into advocacy.

The umbrella didn’t hurt either!

Get the whole book!

 Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you’re cool with that.)

Chapter 2: Advertising is a wall; social is a window

In early 2010, (New Zealand rugby team) the Hurricanes midfielder Ma’a Nonu was all over the media thanks to a radio interview he gave following his team’s 33-27 win over rival team The Chiefs..

It wasn’t the game that got the coverage; it was the way Nonu described it. Specifically, the adjective he used. And used. And used.

The game was, according to Nonu, fucking close. The Chiefs were on the Hurricanes’ fucking tryline when, fucking hell, they scored a fucking last minute try. All the Hurricanes had to do was fucking hold on to the ball in the last five minutes but then, with two minutes to go, fuck, it’s all over again. Then they fucking scored after the hooter had gone.

Golly!

This wasn’t some guy in a pub excited about his team winning a close game. This was an experienced, high profile professional sportsman giving a post-match radio interview.

So why is this relevant to companies interested in social media?

Because even though it involves traditional media, this is a great example of exactly what you need to be prepared for – and even prepared to embrace – when you knock holes in the walls around your brand and allow your people (all of them, not just the marketers) to engage with your customers.

Advertising is a wall; social is a window

Once upon a time, organisations stayed pretty much inside the building. Customer contact was limited, controlled, and on the organisation’s terms. Your “brand” was, more or less, whatever you paid someone to paint on the outside of your building. Advertising was a wall.

Enter social media. In his (recommended) book “Engage”, Brian Solis describes a transformation in the way organisations and customers relate:

• We started with one (brand) to many customers.
• We evolved to one (brand) to one (individual) customer at a time.
• Now we’re undergoing the biggest change yet: many (individual voices within your organisation) to many (individual customers).

Advertising was a wall. Social is a window that allows any customer to connect directly with anyone in your organisation.

So what if they look in the window and Ma’a Nonu tells them to fuck off?

Excellent question.

One answer might be to restrict the number or size of windows and only open them at certain times (strict social media guidelines). Another approach might be to make sure only “trusted” people in your organisation sit near the windows (approved spokespeople).

I reckon neither of those approaches can work long term. Guidelines are useful up to a point, but they won’t stop conversations happening – only make it simpler to discipline people (if that’s what you’re into) when they say something embarrassing or damaging. People like to sit next to windows; and when there’s someone outside saying hello it’s only natural to say hi back.

Why we should care less about the windows and more about what’s inside the building

If we accept that the windows social creates can’t be closed, shuttered or guarded 24/7, we need to accept that people will see in. And by people, I mean everyone: your competitors, your customers, potential staff, people who love you, people who want to see you dead, or at least featured in a tabloid gossip column in association with an ageing Russian shemale prostitute.

What does that mean for an organisation? Simple: the heat’s on to be good.

• To define who you are and what you stand for. Specifically – and critically – your employment brand.
• To hire people whose values and culture are the same as yours. And tell your existing people what you’re all about.
• To make sure everyone in the organisation – everyone – knows what’s going on, every day.
• To default towards openness so when your people talk about you, they’re well informed and don’t need to rely on rumours.

So is Ma’a Nonu coming back into this story? I thought this was about rugby.

I started thinking about Ma’a and his 7-fucks-in-three-minutes because I’d been asked to talk at a marketing event about personal versus corporate tone in social media.

While some might have seen Ma’a’s story as a PR disaster, for me it formed a more powerful and visceral connection to the Hurricanes brand than I’ve ever gotten from advertising. It also opened my eyes to the importance of genuine human emotion for any brand wanting to succeed with social media.

It reminded me too of the famous or infamous incident (depending on your perspective) last year when a Westpac Australia staffer mistakenly tweeted one Friday afternoon from his company rather than personal account: “I am so over today.” Far from harming Westpac’s brand (although in Australia, it would be hard for a bank to sink lower in the public’s estimation) the minor media storm it sparked gave a human face to the bank and left many Australians feeling far more positive about the brand … to the extent that some conspiracy theorists claimed the whole thing to have been planned!

What can we really learn from Ma’a? That when you let social – or a radio interview – open the windows into your organisation, people see what’s really there. You can try to close the windows, but it’s unlikely to work for long.  People will see into the heart of your business, so the heat’s on to make sure what they see is good.

Which takes us nicely to the next chapter …

@3NewsNZ coverage http://bit.ly/c8whX5
Edited audio: http://bit.ly/ <http://bit.ly/id79vk> id79vk <http://bit.ly/id79vk>
Buy Brian Solis’s book “Engage”: http://bit.ly/eJUFIq

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you’re cool with that.)


Chapter 3: Heart –­ the icecream maker's secret ingredient

If there were a social media guided bus tour of Auckland, New Zealand – and who knows, by the time you read this there may well be – the first place it would probably stop would be outside an icecream parlour on Queen Street called Giapo.

Giapo is famous – in New Zealand, anyway – not just for selling some of the tastiest gelato and sorbet anywhere, but for creating one of the country’s most popular and innovative social media networks.

From his laptop at the front of the shop – when he’s not serving customers, making gelato or plotting to provide the entire street with free WiFi – Giapo founder Gianpaolo Grazioli leads a tribe of Twitter followers, a flock of Facebook fans and a hugely popular YouTube channel. On the walls of his shop LCD screens display his tweetstreams and Facebook page, and in one corner you can make a 20-second video to upload to his YouTube channel and share with friends.

Despite all this though, Gianpaolo is about as dismissive of social media, and those who see it as the next marketing silver bullet, as anyone you could ever hope to speak to.

At Giapo, media choice takes a distant second place to what you have to say, and who you really are as an organisation, and as a business owner.

Gianpaolo believes that what really matters is what’s in your heart – or at the heart of your business. Your purpose in life matters more than your vision, mission statement or quarterly plan.

I touched on this in the last chapter … social media lets people see inside your organisation. A wall of advertising might get them to visit once, or try whatever you’re selling one time.

But if what you’re selling doesn’t taste good, or your premises are dirty, or you don’t look after then when they visit, they won’t come back.

With advertising and old-fashioned word of mouth, you could easily consign that 1, or 100, pissed off customers to the “shit happens” file and resolve to try harder next time.

The challenge with social media is that it amplifies everything: good or bad.

People share experiences that effect them emotionally – and disappointment, frustration, embarrassment and anger are pretty powerful emotions. Even before the rise of identified social media, “I hate XYZ” or “XYZ sucks” sites and blogs were all over the net. They still are – social media just makes it easier to share the hatred, one tweet at a time.

Could word of the quality and variety of Giapo’s icecream have spread the way it did without social media? He thinks it could; I’m not so sure. Certainly, no other medium would have built his brand and his business so quickly, and with so little cash.

Gianpaolo talks about it on his blog at gianpaolograzioli.blogspot.com. From his perspective, traditional media like TV can be a great way to get a quick result, but – unless you’ve got the funds to appear regularly – not much good for building success in the long term. Social is the reverse: the effects are slow to appear, but the community he’s built and the loyalty it has for his business is long-lasting. For him, creating a community has been more effective than creating campaigns.

Giapo’s social media success has led to a heap of traditional media exposure too – lots of it about the way he’s used social, but all of it building his fame and driving people to his icecream shop.

And when they visit, they experience the heart of his business: a passionate, loving Italian icecream-maker with staff who love to work for him, making and serving some of the best icecream I’ve ever tasted.

Giapo puts its heart where its mouth is, and social media or none, that’s a recipe for success.

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you’re cool with that.)

 

Chapter 4: Winevault TV and the myth of free

Winevault_4

Freeview? Only if you reckon your time’s worth nothing, says WinevaultTV’s Jayson Bryant.

Video killed the radio star: now it’s after your customers.

Warning: overquoted statistic follows! YouTube is the world’s second most used search engine. In March 2010 Google served around 10.5 billion search results, with YouTube delivering about 3.7 billion. Not all of the searches are for LOLcats either – many brands are posting their ads, recruitment clips, instruction videos and more on YouTube and other video sites.

Most of these brands, though are doing a crap (my analysis, very scientific) job of search optimising their YouTube content while investing shitloads (see previous bracket) in SEO for Google and Bing searches.

Many brands are also ignoring video’s importance as a social tool. If video sharing platforms like YouTube and Vimeo feature at all in marketing plans, it’s as a way to push a “viral video” on an online public who more often than not seem to have been immunised at birth.

Done right though, video can be a great part of a personal or brand social network. It’s not for everyone – some people have faces and personalities better suited to Twitter. And it takes time to do well; lots of it. Jayson Bryant from Winevault TV proves both points.

Jayson runs The Wine Vault, a busy neighbourhood wine shop. More than that, though, he operates one of New Zealand’s most successful social media-based enterprises. His WineVault TV attracts up to 7000 viewers each week, drawn as much by his onscreen personality as his reviews of New Zealand wine.

As well as maintaining his own site at Winevaulttv.com, Jayson posts video content to YouTube, Vimeo and others and is constantly answering customer questions via Twitter and Facebook.

Like US wine phenomenon Gary Vaynerchuk (who has appeared on one of Jayson’s video reviews), Jayson uses video because of the way it lets him form an emotional connection with his customers. for Jayson, wine is all about the story, so using a storytelling medium like video is a perfect match.

And like icecream-maker and fellow social media star Giapo, Jayson has the most important ingredient for a successful social network: he loves what he does and loves sharing his knowledge and passion for wine.

You can fake sincerity when there’s an advertising agency and a paid media channel between you and your customers; strip it back to a video camera and a computer screen and it just doesn’t wash.

Free media: great if you can afford it

Even though Jayson’s hardware investment is minimal and he uses exclusively unpaid media to promote his business, his experience is proof of the real investment needed to build a business with social media.

At first, when he was posting a video review to Wine Vault TV every day, each video was taking seven hours to shoot, edit and upload.

Production was only a small part of the job. Jayson knows the important of search, so takes optimising his content as seriously as making it in the first place. Tailoring the clips for the different platforms he publishes to, including naming, describing and tagging them so people could find them easily took up most of his time – at least until he discovered video publishing tool TubeMogul OneLoad (tubemogul.com).

A (very long) day in the life of a social media wine store

Of course, only so many people will search for video clips featuring “New Zealand pinot noir,” so in addition to the daily video reviews Jayson drives views and builds Winevault TV’s online community through Facebook and Twitter. In between serving customers who walk into his real-world shop he posts two or three messages every hour on Twitter (repeating your message is a good idea on Twitter if you want to be sure your followers will see it) and one on Facebook. On top of that he answers every question he receives, as quickly as he can. Often, these questions are from people who’ve never shopped at The Wine Vault – typically they’ll be from someone standing in a supermarket wine aisle or looking at a restaurant wine list – or even browsing in a competitor’s shop!

Even though answering questions like this are very unlikely to lead to an immediate sale for The Wine Vault, they’ve helped Jayson build a strong online community, a powerful personal brand and a successful real world business*.

Added up – and factoring in his commitment to be on hand when followers in Europe and the USA comment on videos or ask questions – Jayson estimates running WineVaultTV and its associated “free” social media platforms costs him up to 17 hours a day.

Which, if you put any value at all on your time, is about as far from “free” as you can get.

*During research for this book – actually, that makes it sound more formal than it was … hooking up with Jayson over a succession of wines and coffees would be more accurate –  Jayson sold the Wine Vault store and is now concentrating on social media, particularly in the wine industry. He still owns and operates WineVaultTV.

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you’re cool with that.)


Chapter 5: The hive brain ­– why Twitter trumps Google

Car_aerial

Have you ever asked a dictionary for an opinion?

I hope not.

Dictionaries are excellent for finding information; specifically, the definition, spelling, etymology and pronunciation of words. Encyclopaedias (remember them?) are pretty good too (and they smell so good!). And so is Google. If something’s out there, published on the web in a way that the Google algorithm can see and categorise, it’ll find it.

But Google, like dictionaries and encyclopaedias, isn’t much chop when it comes to questions that require understanding, opinion and expertise to answer.

Enter Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. (And their many cousins around the world.)

One of the hidden features of social networks is their awesome ability to create powerful expert knowledge networks.

It all comes about thanks to the way your follower / followed network evolves. Lance Armstrong and other motley celebrities aside, you follow people based on the things they say, and the people they know. The things they say, naturally, relate to what they’re interested in, and what they know about. You follow or befriend them because you’re into the same things.

The result, especially once your network reaches a decent size, is a powerful expert network of people with knowledge about the things that interest you.

Depending on the subject, some of them will know more than you, and some will know less.

So sometimes you’ll be the expert, and sometimes you’ll be the one with the question.

From WTF to FTW: the Twitter hive brain in action

A couple of months ago the car I was a passenger in stopped at the lights behind an odd-looking vehicle. It had a row of stubby aerials on the roof, but no markings to indicate what they were and what the vehicle was.

I took a photo of the vehicle on my phone and tweeted it to my followers. I’m interested in mobile communications, so there happened to be a few people in my network who knew more about the field than I do (not hard) and instantly tweeted me what it was: a mobile phone signal strength testing vehicle.

Google couldn’t have done that. (At least not at the time.)

A wee while after that, I had an issue with a new TV we’d bought. I couldn’t work out how to set it up for Freeview.

The manufacturer’s telephone help line was only open during office hours, during the week. (I bought the TV, as most people do, at the weekend.)

The search function on the manufacturer’s website came up with either nothing at all or way too much irrelevant information.

10 minutes on Google drew a blank – partly perhaps because it was a new model and my model number was New Zealand-specific, so no one had had the same problem before.

The shop I bought it from – as famous for its low product knowledge as for its low prices – didn’t have a clue.

The email help function on the manufacturer’s website promised a response “within 5 working days.”

So I asked Twitter.

And had the correct answer, from three different people, inside five minutes.

These are both pretty trivial examples; I’m sure you can think of other ways the “hive brain” or “lazyweb” can answer questions in ways big dumb search engines can’t.

Of course, your expert network isn’t just limited to the people in your followsphere. Perhaps even more than in the real world, people in social networks like to help. So if you ask a question that your connections can’t answer, they’ll often pass it on by retweeting (Twitter) or sharing (Facebook or LinkedIn). So you could well have your problem solved by someone you’ve never met – and form a handy new connection at the same time.

Google isn’t blind to this, and in mid 2010 began offering “real time” (or pretty bloody close to it) search results that include Twitter. Not quite the same as a human-based expert engine, but if people are talking about the topic you’re interested in, and using the kinds of words you pop into the query box, you could strike it lucky.

LinkedIn is another network where we’re seeing expert networks develop. These happen both organically, in the same way as they do on Twitter, and through the formation and growth of LinkedIn Groups. LinkedIn Groups are typically professionally based – I belong to a bunch of social media, creative and advertising ones. When you belong to a LinkedIn Group you’re notified whenever someone starts a discussion – which is often nothing more than a question someone thinks the hive brain can answer.

If you don’t already use your personal network as a hive brain, why not give it a go? While Google lives on algorithms and advertising revenue, your personal knowledge network is fuelled by karma and reciprocity. And it’s amazing how well that works.

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you’re cool with that.)

 

Chapter 6: The social landscape – a visitor's guide

Nzmap_old

Dear reader: looking at this post, I have to say it makes a much better chapter than it does a blog. I will at some point come back and add a heap of pictures and so on, but in the meantime you’d do better to simply scroll down, pay with a Tweet and download the book. Thanks!

I talk about social networks to clients and other groups now and then, and one of the bread-and-butter parts of any presentation is an overview of each of the main networks, who uses them, what for, and so on. If you’ve ever heard me talk about this – or pretty much any other topic to do with numbers of people using a technology – you’ll know I like to use geographical metaphors. I started doing this at a Google conference called Digital Now 2009. The hot topic back then was the iPhone, and the attention developers and their clients were paying to making applications for it.

During the presentation, I asked the room (marketers, mainly, plus a smattering of advertising bunnies like me) how many of them were considering or working on iPhone applications. About a third of the hands in the room went up. Then I asked how many people were working on something special for people who lived in Timaru. (Timaru is a town in the South Island of New Zealand. About 40,000 people live there and I’m sure every one of them is very nice indeed.)

Same population. No hands.

Now, I know there’s more to audience numbers than quantity, and the iPhone population has grown a little faster than Timaru’s in the year since then. The one thing that has endured, for me, has been the power and simplicity of geography as a simple anchor for social network statistics. That 1.7 million, 250,000 and 70,000 New Zealanders use Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter respectively might not stick in your mind. But Auckland, Christchurch and Palmerston North just might. (Or Pavlodar, Turkistan and Karagandy, if you live in Kazakhstan.)

Anyway, that’s not the point of this chapter. I’m here, as the title says, to give thanks to Tai Tokerau chiefs Tuki Tahua and Ngahuruhuru. In 1793, the dastardly English kidnapped them and whisked them off to Norfolk Island. Not to enjoy a safe, all-meals-included 10-day package holiday as advertised on old people’s radio stations, but to teach the convicts how to turn flax into linen.

Unfortunately for the kidnappers, they were wasting their time. Processing flax was women’s work. On this count, Tuki Tahua and Ngahuruhuru were no help at all.

They did create something very special though: a map of Aotearoa / New Zealand. Ngahuruhuru drew two; one on paper, and the other on the floor in chalk.

I think about this map every time I talk about social networks, and here’s why.

If you’re from New Zealand, or if you know your New Zealand geography, you’ll know that this map doesn’t look much like New Zealand at all.

Orientation aside, the shapes and proportions are all pretty shocking.
Apart from the area where Tuki Tahua and Ngahuruhuru lived.

Compare their map to a modern map of the top of the North Island and you’ll see a heap of accurate detail, including harbours, inlets, islands and beaches. The further south (left) you go, the more vague the detail, and the smaller the features and land areas become.

And that’s why I think about this map every time I think social. I live in Twitter, mostly. I visit Facebook most days, and make the trek to LinkedIn now and then to visit friends. I know a few landmarks in the other networks, but can find my way around Twitter with my eyes closed. That doesn’t mean it’s bigger (it isn’t), has more features (it doesn’t) or is more important (it depends). It’s important to remember that.

What’s your Northland? Where’s your Te Wai Pounamu? Something to bear in mind the next time you’re kidnapped, taken to Norfolk Island and made to draw a map on the floor.

Welcome to the neighbourhood

In the next few pages we’ll be looking at three of the more important social networks (as of late 2010): Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. They’re not a “how-to” – check each platform’s own website or YouTube for that. They’re more an introduction, especially from an advertising or marketing perspective, of what each network does, what they’re good for, and an example or two of how smart marketers have used them well.

Facebook is to social media as Jupiter is to the solar system and fat people are to McDonald’s. As the tired to the point of near death cliché has it, if Facebook were a country, you wouldn’t want to live there.

If you’re looking to build a personal or corporate brand in mainstream social media, you just can’t ignore Facebook. With well north of 500 million users, there’s nothing niche about it. It’s not just for kids either; the fastest growing group on Facebook is over 55 years old.

Like former social media champions Bebo and (recently relaunched) MySpace, Facebook didn’t start out so much as a place to do business but (as the Australians put it) do the business. Facebook was designed as a place for real world college classmates to continue their real world relationships online.

Marketers would do well to remember that. In the same way that when we make a TV ad we’re leaping uninvited into someone’s lounge when they really wanted to be watching a Seinfeld rerun, taking your brand into a social space needs to respect the space for what it is: a social space. Facebook isn’t an online shopping mall filled with people wanting to buy your stuff; it’s an endless strip of bars, nightclubs and cafés with people out having fun with their friends. Using traditional push marketing techniques to sell stuff in this environment just isn’t going to work.

Of course, not all brand activity on Facebook is connected to the businesses that think they own the brands. As I said in an earlier chapter, people own brands, not businesses. So many businesses’ first experience of Facebook is the day they discover they already have a page – courtesy of their fans, haters, or staff.

Here in New Zealand, mainstream beer brand Tui had exactly that experience, with a Facebook fan page that grew to 35,000 members before Tui found out who was running it. It turned out to be a (female) fan of the brand who was beginning to find herself overwhelmed by the popularity of the page and the effort it was taking to administer it, especially since she was expecting a baby. When Tui offered to take it off her hands she was only to happy to agree. (The page has since grown to over 100,000 fans.)

New Zealand general merchandise retailer The Warehouse (think Wal Mart) had a similar experience … just as well, as its staff-created page became essential infrastructure when New Zealand was hit with its most devastating earthquake in almost 100 years …

The Warehouse: networking through New Zealand’s worst earthquake

When Christchurch, the biggest city in New Zealand’s South Island, was rocked by a magnitude 7.1 earthquake before dawn on Sunday 4 September 2010 it wasn’t just many of the city’s heritage buildings that collapsed. Communications networks took a hit too. Dozens of mobile phone aerial towers were knocked out, and those that remained were quickly overloaded by hundreds of thousands of people calling and texting friends and families (mainly with good news – despite its strength the earthquake caused no direct fatalities).

In the days that followed, contacting people was made even more difficult as houses, streets and entire suburbs were evacuated as the ground they were built on liquefied during the earthquake and many aftershocks – making landline contact futile.

For The Warehouse, New Zealand’s biggest general merchandise retailer, this posed huge problems around communicating with staff. While some stores escaped unscathed, others, and the Warehouse’s massive South Island Distribution Centre, sustained considerable damage.

Enter Facebook, and a page that just months earlier The Warehouse knew nothing about. Like many organisations, The Warehouse’s social media strategy was a step or two behind reality. While it was considering whether or not to set up a Facebook page, someone – they didn’t know who – went ahead and did it.  

One of the challenges Facebook presents to brand owners is that there’s nothing stopping pretty much anyone setting up a branded page – providing they’re prepared to tick a box saying that – honest, mister! – they’re the official representative of the brand or product.

Eventually, The Warehouse head office team uncovered who had set up the page – an employee in Christchurch (fittingly, as it it would turn out). When he realised he wasn’t going to get into any trouble for setting up the page, he was more than happy to hand management of the community over to the company.

When the earthquake hit, The Warehouse’s Christchurch Distribution Centre was badly damaged, and several stores were closed due to fallen stock and damaged shelving. Many staff – The Warehouse employs a large number of younger workers – found that the mobile phones they usually rely on were out of action and that the store numbers they were calling were unattended anyway, as they were among the many Christchurch buildings declared (at least temporarily) unsafe to enter. For the company, communicating with staff by landline was made difficult by the fact that many of them had been evacuated from earthquake-hit parts of the city, making their home phone numbers useless.

The Facebook page quickly filled the information void. Warehouse head office team quickly added an “Earthquake” tab as a place to give staff and customers information about which stores were closed and which were open. It also became a place for the company and its staff to share stories about their earthquake experiences, including images of damage to stores and the Distribution Centre. It wasn’t just Christchurch staff who used the page; Warehouse people from all over the country used it to post messages of support. For Christchurch Warehouse employees, the page gave them a sense of belonging and community even though they weren’t at work.

And for the Warehouse, a Facebook page they knew nothing about became one of the most powerful staff and customer communication tools as the business – and its community – faced its biggest ever natural disaster.

Arnott’s Tim Tam Breast Buddies: social media for social good

Like many FMCG marketers, Arnott’s commits a chunk of its marketing budget each year to charitable donations. In many countries, breast cancer charities are the go-to causes, and Breast Cancer Awareness Month sees everything from bottled water to Blu-Tack turn pink in aid of, depending on what you want to believe, saving women’s lives or leveraging disease to turn over product.

In recent years there’s been something of a backlash against the second angle. “Pinkwashing” – marketing a “Pink” product in a way that benefits the marketer more than the charity – has become increasingly unpopular.

At its worst, pinkwashing sees marketers spending many times more money on advertising the donation they’re making (and the product they’re selling) than they actually give to the charity.

Arnott’s New Zealand wanted to reverse that trend, by creating a Facebook-based campaign called Tim Tam Breast Buddies. It was pretty simple: instead of selling specially packaged Tim Tam biscuits as they had previously, Arnott’s created a Facebook Fan Page called Tim Tam Breast Buddies. Then every time someone became a fan, they donated $2 to a breast cancer charity.

Not surprisingly, the offer spread virally, as every time someone became a fan, a message appeared on their own Facebook page telling all their friends what they’d done.

Within days, tens of thousands of people had become “Breast Buddies” and in a couple of weeks the donation target of $60,000 had been met. The last time I checked the page was sitting at around 45,000 fans.

Breast Buddies also delivered an even more valuable benefit than the cash donation. Many of the people who became fans had been affected in some way by breast cancer. So the Breast Buddies page became somewhere for people to talk about their experiences, offer support and make connections with other women living with the disease.

While Tim Tam Breast Buddies might not have led to directly measurable sales, it used social media in a powerful way to build a community whose members supported each other while at the same time sharing positive stories about the Tim Tam brand. Importantly for me (disclosure: I was involved in this campaign) it showed FMCG marketers a way to support breast cancer charities and build their own brands, without resorting to pinkwashing.

ASB Bank Facebook Branch

When I blogged this a few months ago, I titled it “Banking where the fish are.” I wasn’t suggesting that ASB Bank’s customers have gills and taste nice with chips, but that what ASB had done was to set up a branch where their online customers already were, rather than creating a brand new online destination and hoping people will turn up.

It’s funny – in the real world banking or retail business this is basic stuff – you’d be nuts to open a branch in the middle of an empty green field. It makes much more sense to build something in the middle of a big town filled with people who want to do business with you.

ASB applied this thinking to the online world, and opened their branch in New Zealand’s biggest online community (or maybe second biggest, behind online auction site TradeMe).

Essentially, the ASB Facebranch is a Facebook application (app) that provides visitors (just like a real branch, you don’t need to be a customer to come in) secure real time consultations with online tellers. Once you’ve clicked through to the app (and watched a weirdly sexy introductory video from a rather fetching fembot) you’re faced with names and photographs of the branch’s eight staff, along with an indication of whether each one is free or available. Once you’ve picked a teller, a dialogue box opens up and away you go.

You can’t transact here, and the tellers stop short of offering the kind of financial advice that might get them in trouble if you sell your house and invest everything in chickens. (Heard of chickens?) But you can have useful, real, human conversations about banking.

The eight staff are very well trained – they have a great knack for knowing exactly when to link you to a product page or suggest you flip over to online banking.

But trained staff or not, the ASB Facebranch is a hugely brave move for a brand in a traditionally risk-averse category. Looked at with your Risk Goggles on (available on the 85th floor of a bank headquarters near you) ASB is essentially letting its staff write its website on the fly.


Looked at through Human Goggles though (usually handed in as you enter the lift on the ground floor of a bank headquarters near you) they’re doing nothing more than having the kinds of conversations real-world bank tellers have every day.

The ASB Facebook Branch is officially a trial, but with bank marketers around the world watching it just as closely as the ASB head office team, I don’t think it will be long before we see this customer service model pop up elsewhere on Facebook.

Twitter: what Lance Armstrong had for lunch

Twitter is a little bit like the Fight Club. You have to be a part of it to really understand what it’s all about. That said, this would be a pretty rubbish section if I left it at that, so the next few pages will explain what Twitter is, how it works, and why you should give it a go.

Twitter, in its raw form, is an endless stream of short messages from people you choose to follow, viewed on a computer, phone or mobile device.

From those simple building blocks, Twitter can help you not just enhance your real world network, but build an entirely new one online based on shared interests and expertise.

There are several ways to use Twitter. The Twitter website itself, twitter.com is the obvious one but, at least until its recent redesign, wasn’t particularly user friendly. (It’s pretty cool now though.) Most Twitter users I know use third party applications such as TweetDeck or Tweetie, or Twitter’s own iPhone and iPad applications. Which one you use largely comes down to personal preference and there’s no reason you can’t use different applications on different devices.

Whichever tool you use, the basic elements are the same:

Your Twitter username

Like any social network, the first thing you do when you join is choose a username. This can be anything that isn’t already taken (but be careful about pretending to be a famous person or brand – unless you happen to be one). It’s worth thinking carefully about your choice of username. You can change it later on, but it you’ve built up a bunch of followers a changed username is an easy way to lose touch. I use my own name: @vaughndavis.

Your Twitter bio

The only time most people will see this is when they’re deciding whether or not to follow you. So if you want to be followed, make sure your bio and avatar together give people enough reasons to do that.

Your Twitter avatar

No, not the movie, but an image that appears alongside each of your tweets. It’s a quick way for people to spot a friend in the flow of tweets, so choose a distinctive image. Remember that it will often appear really small – especially on mobile devices – so complicated images or text won’t usually work. You can change your avatar whenever the mood takes you, but like changing your username it can confuse your followers. I’ve changed mine a couple of times, but currently use a cool caricature I had done by New Zealand graphic novelist Dylan Horrocks. On that note, if you’re tweeting as an individual, a picture of you is a nice way to connect with your followers, but keep in mind that your tweets are public, so don’t use a photo if your privacy is super-important to you.

Your first tweet

A tweet is 140 characters of text, and that’s that.  The characters can include links to websites (sharing information is a great way to make yourself useful) or pretty much anything you want. Believe it or not, I reckon it’s a good idea to tweet a few times before you even follow anyone. Why? So when you follow your first person and they look at your tweets, there are enough to help them decide whether or not to follow you back.

Following

The only tweets you will see on Twitter are from people you choose to follow. There’s no right or wrong number of people to follow, but every person you add to the list means more tweets flowing past you … so there’s no point in following people if you’re not interested in what they have to say.  See the “who to follow” section in a couple of pages for more.

Your followers

If you’re interesting, useful, or people just like you, you’ll be followed and people will read your tweets. Sometimes people will automatically follow you back just to be polite. And sometimes people will follow you in the hope of a followback, just to build up their numbers. Raw follower numbers are a pretty crude measure of Twitter engagement … obviously you’ll get more from Twitter with more followers, but who those people are and how often you engage with them counts far more than how many there are.

Here’s a bunch of mine, put together in a mosaic by sxoop.com. Some of the avatars work better than others.

Retweets: sharing the love

One of the ways Twitter builds online communities is through retweets. A retweet is simply passing on a tweet from someone you follow, to the people who follow you. As well as being useful to your followers, retweets introduce them to people on Twitter they might not know – maybe giving them a reason to follow someone new.

Direct messages: tunneling under

Tweets are public. Let’s say that again: tweets are public. Every tweet you send appears on a publicly viewable web page that can be seen by anyone, whether or not they follow you. Even if you delete a tweet, assume Google has captured the data and it will be searchable.

Direct messages are a little more secure. A Twitter direct message can only (in theory) be viewed by the person you send it to. So if you want to say something private or exchange personal information like phone numbers or email addresses, a DM is the way to go

OK, I’m on Twitter. Why has my life not changed?

So you’ve taken the plunge and gotten yourself a Twitter account, chosen an amusing handle (username), followed MC Hammer and tweeted once about the weather. Now what?

The three Rs of Twitterrr

I reckon you can’t go far wrong by starting with my three Rs: relationships, research and recruitment. Weather updates and MC Hammer aside, they cover some of the most useful ways I’ve used it in my role (goat farming creative director). They’re not exhaustive, and I’m sure you’ll find other cool uses too. But they’re a start, and you have to admit they do all start with R.

Relationships: this is the big one. Twitter’s power is in bringing people together on the basis of shared interests. So when you see a tweet that interests you, follow whoever tweeted it. Also check out the Twitter Lists that person is on – some of them are sure to relate to an interest you have in common. Follow interesting-looking people from those lists too. Before long you’ll be part of a circle of friends defined by what you’re all interested in. This is a great way to overcome constraints of time and geography to connect to people in the same profession or whatever else interests you. It also means your Twitter circle becomes a pretty powerful tool for the next R ...

Research: OK, you’re connected to a bunch of people who are into the same things you are. Looks like you’re part of an expert network! The great thing about the network you’ve created is that, chances are, there’ll always be someone who knows more than you do about any given topic. So tweeting a question to the “hive brain” or “lazyweb” is a great way to find quick answers from people you know and trust. Just like Wikipedia, though, take care with treating any one answer as gospel. (Of course, this is a two way street. You’re bound to know more than some others in your network about certain things, so if you have an answer to someone’s question, tweet it. Karma!)

Recruitment: Part research, part relationship, completely brilliant. Assuming your Twitter circle is based on shared professional interests, Twitter can be an unbeatable way to advertise new positions and connect with potential hires. Part of the reason is that job ad tweets get lots of retweets – not surprisingly, since passing on a job lead could be doing someone a real favour. So don’t be afraid to ask for retweets. Job title, organisation and a request to DM (direct message) for more details is about all you should need.

There are lots of other ways to use Twitter, but if you’re just starting out, these three are as good a foundation as any. And because they all start with R, they’re super-handy when someone asks you at a party – just like you once did – what Twitter is all about. Imagine it!

Attractive but ignorant fellow partygoer: “Say, what’s Twitter all about?”

You: (momentarily stumped) “Aaaahhhh….”

Her: “Aaah?”

You (remembering this chapter): “R! Three of them in fact. The first R stands for relationships … speaking of which, are you single?”


Look who’s stalking: choosing who to follow on Twitter

This is one of those questions that, once you’ve been on Twitter for a while, gets filed under “duh”. But when you’re new to it, “Who do I follow?” is almost as common a question as “What do I talk about?” The short answer is, of course, to follow whoever you like. The slightly longer answer is to follow these pointers to help you quickly build your Tweet stream to the point where it’s (hopefully) informative, entertaining and relevant.

Search for people you know in real life. This is as simple as using the “Find People” function in the Twitter web interface and clicking “follow” when they appear on the listing that results. Make sure you’re following the right person though ... If your friend has a common name you might not. An easy way to check is to look at their tweets before following. If you’re after a model train enthusiast friend, wall to wall tweets on scuba diving would suggest you have the wrong person. (Or that your train enthusiast friend is something of a renaissance man.)

Look at other people’s followers and followed lists. If you’re following someone you can see who they’re following too, and who’s following them. Chances are, you’ll know some of these people. Take a look at their recent tweets and biography. If they seem interesting, follow them.

Look at who’s being retweeted. This is one of the coolest things about Twitter, and one of the main ways it leads to organically formed communities based on shared interests. When one of the people you’re following likes a tweet enough to retweet it, there’s a good chance you’ll like other tweets from the original tweeter too. Click on their username and see what else they’ve been tweeting about. Sound interesting? Follow!

There are lots of other ways to find people to follow (including the Twitter Lists feature) but these three are a good starting point.

Business time: how can a brand use Twitter?

Sadly, unless you are very famous indeed, no one really wants to know what you had for lunch, and unless you’re a celebrity chef it probably doesn’t relate to your brand. A lot of businesses believe, though, that they should “be on Twitter,” without considering exactly why, and how it relates to business objectives. Or even asking themselves if enough of their customers are on Twitter to make it worthwhile.

Assuming you’ve ticked both those boxes though (I am such an optimist!) some reasons you might consider investing some time in Twitter are:

Customer service: a growing number of customers – especially tech and media savvy ones – are expecting brands to be available and responsive on Twitter. Don’t overlook the “responsive” side. Once you hang out your sign in Twitter, people will expect answers to their questions within minutes, 24/7. Here in New Zealand, @telecomnz @asbbank @flyairnz @vodafonenz all run pretty smooth Twitter based customer service accounts.

Promotions: follow me and win a pony! Well, why not? This can work as direct Twitter-only promotions or as a way to alert your customers to limited time or availability offers elsewhere. Because of the way tweets constantly flow past your followers though, Twitter isn’t always the best way to get a message in front of a customer. “Pull” tactics such as answering customer questions will usually work much better than “push” ones like sending out offers.

@airnzfairy, the Air New Zealand Fairy  (formerly known at the Airpoints Fairy) is a good example of combining pull and push. Each day the Fairy asks followers who would like a wish granted. From the requests she receives, she chooses one and makes it come true. Not surprisingly, requests for wishes and discussions afterwards build up a fair amount of chatter each day, increasing her popularity and building her community. The Fairy isn’t the airline’s only Twitter presence (see the “dozen bonfires” chapter for more on that) but she does one thing and does it well.

Connecting: simply engaging directly with your customers through Twitter – or any social network – can be a powerful way to slice through the barriers that usually stand between you and find out what people think about you and how they are feeling. For customers, the opportunity to connect with a real person puts a human face to what might otherwise be an anonymous corporation – strengthening their connection to your brand too.

Twitter also offers brands the opportunity to advertise directly via promoted Tweets and Trends but so far this attempt to (finally) make money from the platform has met with a fair degree of resistance and in some cases has done the brands involved more harm than good. If you’re considering this approach, tread carefully!

However you choose to use Twitter, the two main points are to treat it as a commitment – once you’re on there your customers will expect you to be active and responsive – and to make sure that commitment is connected to a business goal. If it isn’t, and it becomes nobody’s job, all you’re going to create is a pissed off online community.

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you’re cool with that.)
.

Chapter 7: choirs, soloists and other matters of tone

I was lucky enough recently to find myself on the island of Savai’i – the larger but less developed major island in the South Pacific nation of Samoa.

I was there – largely thanks to connections I’ve made through social media – to present a documentary on the work of the Fred Hollows Foundation. The Foundation works in developing countries providing incredibly cost-effective cataract surgery to people who might otherwise never have their sight restored. They do wonderful work, and it was a great privilege to accompany them for a week or so.

While we were in Savai’i we were joined by a very famous Samoan New Zealander, Michael Jones. MJ was once a member of the All Blacks – New Zealand’s national rugby team – and famously scored the first try in the first ever Rugby World Cup. In recognition of his sporting success and the high regard he’s held in in Samoa and New Zealand. Michael holds the title of Matai (chief).

Towards the end of our time in Samoa, Michael joined us for dinner (and an after-dinner singalong – he was also famous as one of the All Blacks’ tour-bus guitarists) and gave a speech about his role as an ambassador for the Fred Hollows Foundation. The next morning he was to visit the village of Tafua (where we’d spent much of the week) to lend his mana to the cause and spread the foundation’s message. But here’s the thing: he wasn’t going to say a word.

That’s because in Samoan village culture, speaking is something that Matai just don’t do – at least in public. Instead, every Matai has a Talking Chief (tulafale) – not necessarily a high born person, but someone with a gift for the gab who speaks at public and ceremonial occasions on the chief’s behalf.

Tulafale exist for three main reasons:

1. Efficiency: there just aren’t enough hours in the day for a Matai to talk to everyone who wants to talk to him
2. Skill: not every great chief is a great orator. Employing an expert makes sense.
3. Status: speaking to commoners is below a Matai’s status

I didn’t go to Samoa expecting to learn about social media strategy, but it turns out there are a few things we can take from the Matai / Tulafale approach.

1. Efficiency. This makes a lot of sense. Social media can be a fantastic way for a brand to form strong, intimate bonds with its customers. But for this to happen, interactions need to be frequent and you need to be responsive. People, especially young, digital people, expect fast answers. Delegating or sharing the social media approach – employing not just one Tulafale but an entire tribe – can give you this.

2. Skill. Forming and maintaining online relationships doesn’t come naturally to everyone. Selecting people with the right mix of online experience and corporate knowledge is crucial. If there’s a trick to this, it’s to look beyond whichever department “owns” your social experience for people with natural aptitude. Telecom New Zealand, for example, uses volunteers from all over the business, including technical specialists. The other advantage to this is that is means collectively the team is far more likely to have a useful answer to a customer question than any one person could.

3. Status. This is where it gets tricky. While the idea of the Matai being too important to talk directly to seems to go down well in Samoa, it’s not so likely to fly in other countries. Surprisingly though, a number of CEOs and political leaders take this approach, employing Ghost Tweeters or Facebook Phantoms to speak on their behalves online. I get that if you’re running the country – or a corporation the size of one – it can be hard to find time to Tweet.

I think the better approach though is to be open about ghosted accounts – using terms like “Tweets from the office of…” or “Posts from the staff of…” rather than pretending to be the real deal. Then when the CEO/Prime Minister/Pope does engage in person, make that clear. Receiving a personal tweet / text / Facebook update from someone famous and powerful can be a real buzz, but that will quickly get diluted if it’s clearly from the some tweetwriting flunky rather than the big cheese.

Ghost tweeting: the ghoul the bad and the ugly

It’s OK to be a ghost. CEOs and politicians have been doing it forever. Did the boss of the power company really write that letter he sent you threatening to turn your lights out? Did Kennedy write his own speeches?

But the best ghosts are transparent. If you’re going to have someone tweet on your behalf, fess up about it. Then, when you do occasionally drop by in person it will be even more powerful.

The Air New Zealand Fairy doesn’t disclose who she really is – that’s part of the mystery. It’s also a big advantage to the airline … if whoever Tweets for her is away, or leaves for good, someone else can step into her fairy-boots without anyone noticing there’s been a change (assuming they’ve put together a decent enough set of character guidelines).

Scared of ghosts? How about a fairy?

This is another approach that gets around several of the challenges inherent in using a personal medium like Facebook or Twitter to communicate as a company. The Air New Zealand Fairy (née Airpoints Fairy) is a character invented by the marketing team at Air New Zealand. Her reason for being is to give away little treats every day to followers she deems deserving.

Flying solo: great until you need to take a pee

I flew planes for a living once; big ones, with a crew of between five and ten, depending on what were doing and where we were going. One of the great things about having a crew – and in particular, having more than one pilot, is that you could get up and take a pee (the toilet was at the opposite end of the aeroplane) without the plane spiraling out of control and plunging into the Pacific, momentarily illuminating the empty ocean with an orange fireball before disappearing beneath an oil-slicked swell, leaving nothing but a couple of cushions and a startled albatross in its wake.

I thought about this recently when I was listening to Duncan Blair talk about his experience as the social media voice of New Zealand telecommunications company Orcon.

As well as running marketing at Orcon and DJing under the name of Phixx, Duncan ran Orcon’s Twitter and Facebook account, pretty much singlehandedly. The upside of this was that Duncan’s technological and product knowledge and personality shone through, attracting a heap of even non-Orcon-customers to its online accounts.

The downside is that when he got up to go for a pee, things went off the boil. When he took his first extended vacation since setting Orcon up on Twitter and Facebook, tweets, mentions, conversations and new followers all dropped off. Without Duncan at the wheel, Orcon became a much less interesting online brand. Take a look at Orcon’s graph from TweetStats.com in the gallery at the bottom of this post.

Today, even though Duncan has moved on, Orcon is still largely sticking with the Solo approach – one person is fronting the account with help from others in the company as needed.

Contrast this to what Telecom New Zealand is doing a couple of pages over. Of course, Telecom is a huge company, while Orcon would probably need to get ring-ins to fill a social soccer team. But the principle still holds.

Vodafone New Zealand: the power and perils of personality

Over at Vodafone, New Zealand’s biggest mobile phone operator, Corporate Communications Manager Paul Brislen was in much the same boat. When Paul was on, Vodafone crackled with energy and personality. Questions were answered, conversations were had and Vodafone quickly became a well loved online brand, even if its customers weren’t always all that happy in the real world. One media commentator referred to it as the “Paul Brislen effect” – the online community’s affection for Paul lifted the Vodafone brand, and shielded it from a lot of criticism it might have otherwise received. Corporations are easy to hate – a regular guy with a wife and kids is a little harder to dig your online claws into.

Take a look at the Vodafone Tweetstats in the gallery at the bottom of this post. The downside of the effect, is that when Paul left the company recently it seems much of its online mojo went with him. (Disregard the Jan-Jun data glitch.)

Telecom: tweeting as a team

Since we’re taking telcos, it’s worth contrasting these two with Telecom New Zealand’s experience (Telecom is about the same size here as Vodafone). Instead of hitching its social wagon to one online star, Telecom has almost from the beginning taken a team approach. Its online community team is made up of volunteers drawn from across the business. Telecom’s Twitter homepage shows nine of the team, and each of them signs off their tweets with their initials; so even though you’re talking to one of New Zealand’s biggest companies, you retain the personal touch.

Interestingly, none of the people who tweet for Telecom are from marketing, communications or PR; they’re subject experts from all around the business. So depending on what kind of question you have, you’ll end up talking to a person who knows about the subject – rather than someone trying to put a marketing spin on things.

Again, a peek at TweetStats tells a pretty clear story. Even though people have come and gone from the Telecom Twitter team, none of these individual arrivals or departures has hurt its online presence. In contrast to Vodafone and Orcon its tweet count (which is a crude but good enough measure of engagement) has risen steadily month after month.

Telecom’s Twitter page, features the name and picture of each of its team members. Tweets are shared between the team so response speed is good and there’s usually an expert on hand. Each tweet is signed off with the team member’s initials. (Like many companies, Telecom uses collaborative Twitter platform CoTweet to manage everything: cotweet.com). This is also the approach Vodafone New Zealand uses now, and for me is pretty much the gold standard of how to run a corporate Twitter account.

Cleared for takeoff

Coming back to the flying analogy then, flying solo is great if you’re piloting a jet in an airshow and want to inject your personality into the display. Take your hands off the controls though, and things can fall apart pretty quickly. If you want your plane to actually go places,  you’re better off with a crew. Getting a good one together then giving them the freedom to deal honestly and naturally with your Twitter community is a great way to build your brand online.

Get the whole book!


Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you're cool with that.)

 


 

(download)

Chapter 8: Ear to the ground – the art of listening

Dalek

So to be clear, when you say “exterminate,” are you referring to our pest control business or threatening to kill us all?

In the chapter “Why do social? Because social’s doing you.” I talked about the fact that there are online conversations happening about your brand all the time. If people are saying things in those conversations about you that aren’t true, you owe it to your brand health to get in there and set things straight.

But how do you find out when and where those conversations are happening in the first place?

Listening is just as important to your social media plan as talking. While there are plenty of companies out there who will charge you a lot of money for this (usually framed as “social media monitoring”) there are plenty of cash-free alternatives. Warning though, Will Robinson, they only work if you or someone in your organisation have the time and ability to use them!

Many spies / many eyes. I’m not sure if this is really a line in one of the Lord of the Rings movies, or if Flight of the Conchords were just improvising in their song, “Frodo, don’t wear the Ring.” Anyhoo, my point is, if you are a big organisation with relatively online-savvy staff, you’ve got a ready-made social media monitoring framework in place.

Your staff are already seeing conversations happening about you online. All it takes to make use of this is to make it easy for people to pass those conversations on. This can be as simple as appointing someone in the organisation as your social media point person and letting people know to pass links on to them. What they do with the information, of course, is what really matters, and this comes down to your overall social engagement strategy. Knowing what’s being said is critical though.

Google Alerts: these are free, fast and pretty powerful. A Google Alert is basically a standing request for a Google Search, that reports results to you by email. Like any Google search, the trick is to choose your search terms carefully to make sure you get relevant information. Depending on how hotly your ears are burning, you can have alerts sent weekly, daily, or as they happen. Google alerts are free and you can have as many search terms as you like. Take a look at google.com/alerts and have a play!

Blog search: and yes, Google does one of these too (you can include blogs in your Google Alerts searches). A few years back, blogs were reserved for the late night keyboard bashers discussing how to tackle the latest World of Warcraft foe or what to wear to the next medieval reenactment society orgy. This has changed with the rise of user-friendly platforms like Wordpress, Blogger and Posterous, and even if they’re not all being read by as many people as, oh, I don’t know, vaughndavis.posterous.com, they’re certainly being written and in big numbers. Google Blog search and blog/social specialist search engine Technorati are good ways to find out when you feature in these posts and subsequent discussions. (Ironically, the Technorati.com search window takes a bit of searching for because the page is filled with advertising.) Blogpulse adds trend monitoring, but if you’re a New Zealand brand your search terms are unlikely to appear in Blogpulse’s worldwide stats (unless it’s a worldwide trending topic such as the Pike River Mine disaster).

Twitter-specific search: since most conversations on Twitter are open, they’re easier to see into than on Facebook or LinkedIn. search.twitter.com lets you look at any search term you choose in real time. Third party services such as Twilert.com add a bit of spice to that basic search functionality, summarising your keyword traffic and emailing you the results daily or whenever you choose.

Socialmention.com looks at 50+ social platforms (or just the ones you choose) to deliver search results, stats and even a measure of sentiment (to the extent that its robot can work it out). Socialmention also has a free email alert service.

Paid search: in the paid space, Radian6 is the best known platform (among a growing number of alternatives, including TrackUR and New Zealand-made M-Savvy and Chatterbox).  Its promotional material is focused on sales-oriented companies and is as cheesy as any number of pizza kitchens: “The social phone is ringing – are you ready to answer?” But it does present a sexy dashboard view of what people are saying about you and where.

Critically, Radian6 (and other tools like it) can’t see into private conversations on Facebook or LinkedIn – leaving you blind to an important volume of conversations – but maybe that’s a good thing.  Radian6 isn’t cheap – you’ll pay AUD125 a month per user plus AUD700 a month per “topic profile” – but it does seem to do the business and is the monitoring weapon of choice for a bunch of big US brands as well as advertising and PR agencies.

Search isn’t the same as sentiment

While social media monitoring tools – as of late 2010 – are getting very good at plucking the most casual whisper about your brand out of the social sphere and reporting on their frequency and whereabouts, what none of them seems to have cracked is an accurate measure of sentiment. Philosophically, this could be to do with computer algorithms not being well know for their emotional quotient (if we discount C3POs occasional bursts of paranoia or HAL’s musical acid trip when Dave Bowman starts yanking out his processors). More likely, it’s just a matter of time until someone creates a programme smart enough to differentiate mean (as in cruel) from mean (as in wicked, by which I mean the complimentary meaning of wicked) from mean (as in average, by which I mean the sum of the values in a data set divided by the number of values in the set) from mean (by which I mean the verb form of mean, meaning denote or signify).

What does this all mean? You need a human being to gauge human emotions. Social media monitoring tools can tell you when everyone is talking about you, and give you an idea of the topics they’re discussing, but you need to poke your virtual nose in yourself to understand how people are really feeling about you and your brand, so you can decide whether or not to get involved in the conversation.

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or additions of the book so please only leave a comment if you're cool with that.)

 

Chapter 9: Did digital kill the video star?

Twizel

The marketing revolution will not be televised

A couple of years ago I met up with expat Kiwi Mark D’Arcy in his frankly enormous New York office at Time Warner, where he was Chief Creative Officer. (He was something even more impressive the last time we met, and will have no doubt been promoted again by the time you read this.) Unlike plenty of people in American companies with fancy titles, Mark was a real actual Big Swinging Dick, heading an important part of the company. His team created branded content and built partnerships between advertisers and Time Warner film, TV and online properties. Like me, Mark was once a Creative Director at a big multinational advertising agency. He jumped ship – and Time Warner set up the division – because of the way our relationship with media is changing.

“It used to be you’d come into work on Monday morning and talk about that great ad you saw on TV the night before,” said Mark, as he stood in front of the million-dollar Central Park sunset view from his office window while his six-foot blonde former supermodel personal assistant mixed our drinks in the far corner of his office, 30 metres away. “These days, apart from the Superbowl, those shared experiences are gone. Even without the drift from broadcast TV to the Internet, we’ve now got hundreds of channel choices here in the US – and advertisers just can’t be everywhere anymore.”

When I returned to New Zealand (this was around 2007) it was pretty clear that not many local brands were thinking that way. The big “above the line” campaign was still the standard approach for most advertisers and spending a million on making a TV ad didn’t raise many eyebrows. Over at Air New Zealand, though, changes were afoot …

Frequent fire: how air New Zealand is changing airline marketing

Air New Zealand used to market itself like any medium sized airline. Most weeks it would run retail offers on TV and in newspapers, flogging seats to wherever it had space. Most years it would spend a big chunk of its marketing budget on making a beautiful, epic TV ad, then run it alongside the retail stuff.

That all changed on GM of Marketing Steve Bayliss’s watch. The way Air New Zealand advertises itself now is very different to traditional airline advertising, and its use of social and other digital channels forms a big part of that. Steve described the approach in a newspaper interview earlier this year. (As it happens, he left the company soon afterwards but his marketing philosophy seems to have remained in place.)

For me, it sums up how social media has changed the way smart brands approach advertising. Like any good story, it’s grown in my mind since I first heard it. Here’s the long version:

Every year, brands would compete to build the best and biggest fire. Most of each year was spent preparing for the year’s fire. Building a popular fire involves a lot of planning and a lot of important decisions.

Where shall we build the fire? Up high where it can be seen? Or in a sheltered spot so the wind doesn’t blow it out?

Could the fire use any extras, maybe some herbs to make it smell nice (for the female household fire-lover demographic) or some non-lethal explosives (for the man of the house)?

And then, on one special night, when the moon is high and full and the wind is just right, the fire is lit. If you’re lucky – if you’ve planned well, thought about what kind of fire the modern fire-fan is looking for today and executed perfectly – a crowd will gather around your fire, quite possibly cook sausages on it and tell their friends what a great fire it was.

If you’re unlucky, no one will come. The fire will burn itself out, the sausages will go back in the fridge and the firebuilders will make their way back to the office, wondering if their LinkedIn profiles are up to date.

For most big brands – beers, airlines, carmakers, utility companies and more – the single bonfire approach sums up their approach to marketing. Yes, there’d be other activity in support, but the Big Television Commercial still forms the heart of the annual marketing calendar for some very big, and very smart brands.

This is a great strategy when it works (but aren’t they all?). I’ve made big TV ads myself, and know how quickly they can change the way an entire country feels about a brand. For Air New Zealand, though, one fire wasn’t enough.

I’m not sure if Steve Bayliss has ever met Mark D’Arcy but I think they’d see eye to eye on this one. Like Mark, Steve has seen the writing on the wall for the blockbuster TV ad (aka the single bonfire.)

Instead, Steve and Air New Zealand take a dozen bonfires approach: when they see a  marketing idea they like, they do it, and see how it goes. In Steve’s words, “we light a lot of little fires, then wait and see which ones people stand around. Then we throw petrol on those ones.”

For Steve, the day of the big annual brand ad – the single bonfire – is dead. The new digital and social world is both the driver and the enabler here. The driver, because the audience fragmentation Mark D’Arcy saw at Time Warner is now even more real, and it’s made even worse by the commercial-zapping abilities of platforms like TiVo, MySky, Apple TV and other PVRs. But it’s also the enabler, with social and digital technologies allowing brands to go to market with far more speed, and far less risk (of wasted investment, anyway) than ever before.

Today, we can film and load a piece of content to YouTube for less than the catering budget of a conventional TV shoot. And unlike broadcast TV, campaign reach is purely driven by the power of the idea, not the size of the budget. (Which is good or bad news, depending on how you look at it!)

That said, some of Air New Zealand’s biggest online successes have involved considerable production investment – such as their “Nothing to hide” bodypainting spots and current “Rico” puppet campaign. Just because online content can be cheap doesn’t mean it must be cheap – quality production still helps!

To work well, though, the dozen bonfires approach needs (duh) a dozen bonfires. This has a pretty big implication for advertising agencies, who are traditionally experts at the plan-all-year-then-light-the-fire approach. Taking the power away from the agency planners and handing it to the punters is a pretty painful shift. For Air New Zealand – at least on Steve Bayliss’s watch – it meant fundamental change to the agency-client relationship, with Bayliss declaring publicly that he was happy to consider good ideas from anywhere, even Twizel (a very small and very isolated town in New Zealand’s South Island, better known for its hydroelectricity than its marketing ideation).

Yes, the Big Television Commercial will remain a powerful and potent thing for some time to come. We’ll still make them, our peers will still award them, and if conditions are perfect, people may still talk about them at work on a Monday morning.

But they’ll become less common. The immediacy of social, combined with the lower production and media costs of digital, guarantees it.

Get the whole book!

Just hit the button below to download the entire 90-page ebook for the price of a Tweet or Facebook status update. Please also jump in with your comments and corrections in the comments section on this page. (These may form part of any future revisions or editions of the book so please only leave a comment if you're cool with that.)